Pennsylvania Department of Education

 






COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
333 MARKET STREET
HARRISBURG, PA 17126-0333







Special Education Report
Thursday, August 28, 2008

Entity: Mount Union Area SD
Address: 28 W Market St
Mount Union, PA 17066-1232
Phone:
Contact Name:

 

School District Demographics

School District

IU #

Superintendent

# of Bldgs

Total Enrollment

Total Unduplicated SES Students

Mount Union Area SD

Tuscarora IU 11

Mr. James Estep

4

1521

291



District Special Education Contact:

Name

Title

Phone

Fax

Email

Tonya DeVecchis-Kerr

Director of Special Education/Student Services

814-542-8631

814-542-2964

tdevecchis-kerr@muasd.org

Special Education Plan Team Members

Name

Affiliation

Membership Category

Appointed By

Bambi Guentner

Mount Union Area School District

Ed Specialist - School Psychologist

Tonya DeVecchis-Kerr

Brian Kritzer

Mount Union Area School District

Special Education Teacher

Tonya DeVecchis-Kerr

Candi Gilliland

Mount Union Area School District

Regular Education Teacher

Tonya DeVecchis-Kerr

Curt Whitesel

Mount Union Area School District

Administrator

Tonya DeVecchis-Kerr

Donna Waleski

Tuscarora Intermediate Unit 11

Other

Tonya DeVecchis-Kerr

James Estep

Mount Union Area School District

Administrator

Tonya DeVecchis-Kerr

Randy Crowder

Mount Union Area High School

Special Education Teacher

Tonya DeVecchis-Kerr

Robert Wydock

Mount Union Area School District

Special Education Teacher

Tonya DeVecchis-Kerr

Sonja Boozel

Mount Union Area High School

Special Education Teacher

Tonya DeVecchis-Kerr

Susan Bender

Mount Union Area School District

Regular Education Teacher

Tonya DeVecchis-Kerr

Tonya DeVecchis-Kerr

Mount Union Area School District

Administrator

Tonya DeVecchis-Kerr

Yvette Weller

Mount Union Area School District

Special Education Teacher

Tonya DeVecchis-Kerr

Program Evaluation (P.L. 105-17, §612(2) and §613(a))

Current Program Strengths and Highlights

The Mount Union Area School District is a small rural district in central Pennsylvania.  We are dedicated to providing all students with a free and appropriate public education.  The district offers a full range of services within the district for our students with disabilities, which include:  learning support, life skills support, emotional support, speech and language support, multiple disabilities support and autistic support.  We also offer services for protected handicapped students. The pre referral process includes IST and Child Study teams. 

For the past four years we have been involved with the Verbal Behavior Project for our children with autism. This classroom is located at the Mount Union — Kistler Elementary School.  All of the children in this classroom are included based on individual need.  One of the students spends a significant amount of their day in a general education kindergarten class. 

We also have provided training for all of our staff on co-teaching, differentiated instruction and LRE.  We have initiated an inclusion program that involved intensive training during the summer of 2008 with on site visits by a national presenter during the 2008-2009 school year.  We have also written for and received the Inclusion Mini Grant that we are using for site visits, materials and trainings.  A portion of our staff is currently involved in an after school teacher book-study group discussing inclusion.  This involved administrators, general education, special education staff, paraeducators and parents.

 The High School Supports both a Life Skills classroom and a multiple disabilities classroom.  Our inclusion initiative began at the High School and we are seeing success not only in student adjustment but the numbers regarding LRE are reflective of the inclusion initiative.  We have a full time Emotional Support teacher located at the high school who provides itinerant emotion support services to our students.  This person is also involved in crisis intervention and provides support to students at the Career and Technology Center if needed.  We have available to student with higher learning needs learning support teachers who provided reading and math instruction according to the IEP.

The district monitors the least restrictive environment of each student through regular MDE meetings, IEP meetings and progress monitoring.  Special education students are provided access to all services available to regular education students.  All classrooms facilities for special education students are appropriate size and location to meet the needs of our students.. 

The District's Special Education staff members are properly certified.  These staff members meet Act 48 requirements.  District personnel have a solid understanding of the basic special education procedures, laws and regulations and participate in staff in-service regarding special education and general education.  Special educators are provided the necessary instructional materials, equipment and supplies to implement student IEPs.

Due to our small class size, our teachers are able to develop bonds and relationships with our students that help them throughout their school years as well as transcending beyond school.  Our staff provides a very caring, goal oriented and nurturing environment for our students.  This is very individualized based on our students' needs. 

Transition has been strengthened over the past two years.  Currently, we provide a variety of site visit to our students looking at employment and post secondary opportunities.  Outside agencies such as OVR, Career Link are involved in the transition process.  We have utilized our AmeriCorp representative to help, plan and organize activities related to transition.

District staff works closely with agencies involved with the children and their families.  District staff regularly attends and is actively engaged in interagency coordination.  We also work closely with Children and Youth services as well as local physicians.  

District staff is involved with Early Intervention staff in order to provide a seamless transition to school age.  We have strong parents participation at IEP and MDE meetings stressing the importance of parental input..



 

Identifying Students with Learning Disabilities


Mount Union Area School District implements a  prereferral process; such as and Instructional Support Team or Child Study Team to screen and identify students who may be in need of learning support services.   This prereferral team always consists of the parent of the child and teachers involved with the child.  The team could also include the counselors, building administrators, bus drivers, specialists, physicians, outside agencies and any other individual having information regarding the individual child.  After prereferral interventions have been in place the team determines if there is a need for a psychoeducational evaluation.  The team will issue a referral that includes demographic information and any pertinent medical/health information to the Special Education Office.  Then the Special Education Office will issue a Permission to Evaluate and Procedural Safeguards to the parent.   Once the Permission to Evaluate is received the MUASD will proceed in gathering information as indicated on the Permission to Evaluate. This could involve ability testing, achievement testing, behavioral rating scales, adaptive behavior rating scales and any other information relating to the individual child. 

Once the school District has the evaluation results gathered, a Multidisciplinary Team is convened by the District's School Psychologist.  The team will review all the information and use the information to determine by consensus if the student is a student with Specific Learning Disability.  The primary diagnosis of Specific Learning Disability is based on a discrepancy between the student's Aptitude and Achievement as measured by standardized, norm referenced assessments, or by a pattern of strengths or weaknesses relative to age or grade.  The District reviews all exclusionary factors that suggest that a student may not be a student with Specific Learning Disability if the primary reason for the students inability to meet age and grade level standards may be related to any of the following:  Vision, hearing or motor problems; mental retardation, emotional disturbance; cultural and/or environmental issues; or Limited English proficiency.  
  

Enrollment Differences

Not significantly disproportionate.

Ethnicity Enrollment Differences

No significant disproportionality by race or ethnicity.

Exiting Statistics

During the 2007-2008 school year, we have provided our students with school to work opportunities working with employers and other agencies such as Career Link and OVR.  We are also using our AmeriCorp person to provide additional transition activities to our students.  We are providing our students with on site visits to technical schools, employment sites, junior colleges.  We actively seek to find local job opportunities for our students and then make a modified school day experience for the students.  We also provide remedial on line courses for our students. 

We also  have the opportunity to involve our students with special needs in the Career and Technology Center beginning in 9th grade.  This starts their skill development a year earlier.  This also aids in career exploration. 

During their 2007-2008 school year, student/teacher advisory groups were formed.  Each teacher is assigned a group of students beginning in 7th grade to advise and mentor.  Regularly scheduled meetings are held to monitor progress and advise.  This is an on going process that is continuing into future years.  Each advisor stays with the same group until graduation.

With the implementation of these programs, we will improve the district's graduation rate and decrease the dropout rates.  During the 2008-2009 school year the graduation rate will increase to 88% and the drop out rate will decrease to 11%.  During the 2009-2010 school year the graduation rate will increase to 91% and the drop out rate will decrease to 8%.  During the 2010-2011 school year the graduation rate will increase to 94% and the drop out rate will decrease to 4%.

24 P.S., §1306 and §1306.2 Placements

Facilities for Nonresident Students

Facility Name

Provider of Educational Services

# of Students Receiving Srvcs as of Dec 1

IFC

Mount Union Area School District

2

Incarcerated Students Oversight

The District will ensure implementation of Child Find activities through:  evaluation procedures, development of Individualized Education plans, educational placements, re-evaluation, personnel development, maintenance of confidentiality, parental involvement, surrogate parents assignment, private school placements, procedural safeguards and due process procedures.  The requirement includes an approved academic program, appropriate credentials of personnel, appropriate supervision and provision of the program consistent with special education standards and regulations.  Incarcerated student remain eligible for education service in the same manner and to the same extent as a student who has been placed in an alternative education program for disruptive students.  The educational program and placement will permit students to make normal academic progress and achieve requirements for graduation as defined by the home district.The district would conduct  psychoeducational testing, convening the MDE/IEP teams to determine the level of need and services.  Once decided, the agency responsible for providing educational services would provide FAPE to the student (s).

Facilities for Incarcerated Students

Facility Name

Provider of Educational Services

# of Students Receiving Srvcs as of Dec 1

None

None

0

Least Restrictive Environment 34 CFR §300.551

Ensuring Maximum Integration

At every IEP meeting the team first discusses the LRE for each student, looking at the general education setting with supplementary aides and services. The team includes all of the required personnel as well as any personnel that has knowledge of the child and the types of support the child needs.  Outside agencies involved with the child and the family are also included in this decision making process.  The district staff also attends/participates in the meeting of students placed outside of the school district in partial placement, alternative settings, etc. 

The district has initiated an inclusion initiative since January 2008. We were awarded the Inclusion Mini Grant in the amount of $15,000.   As a result of this grant we have conducted session for all staff on inclusion, co-teaching, differentiated instruction and LRE.  The sessions were presented to the staff by IU 11 personnel.   Also, we just concluded a teacher book study group reading, discussing and synthesizing the book, "Making Inclusion Work" by Francis Murphy.  These sessions were attended by an average of 26 educators both general education and special education.  Personnel from IU 11 also help to facilitate the session.  As a result of the evaluation sheets the staff indicated their needs and views on where we need to go from here.

Currently, we are in the process of scheduling site visits to sites that are successfully implementing inclusion in their districts. We are attending the session being presented by Dr. Villa on May 13, 2008 and have already viewed the Webinar presented by Twin Valley Middle School administrators. 

During the summer of 2008, all staff  (general ed teachers, sp education teachers, administrators and paraeducators) will be attending a two day in-service presented by Dr. Richard Villa.  Dr. Villa will be providing information on inclusion, co teaching, differentiated instruction and flexible grouping.  He will be returning for follow up two days in November 2008 and one day in January 2009.  Parent will be encouraged to attend these sessions.  Also, a parent information session is planned for August 27, 2008.

We are in the process of researching and purchasing AimsWeb for the high school staff to aide with progress monitoring of students.

Building administrators are examining the master schedule to include common planning time for grade level general and special education teachers.

Supplementary Aids and Services

Service

Comment

Adapted grading

As determined by the IEP team

Adapted testing

As determined by the IEP team

Preferential seating

As determined by the IEP team

Study guides, word banks

As determined by the IEP team

Assistive Technology

As determined by the IEP team

Paraeducators

As determined by the IEP team

Professional Development

Regular and special education staff and paraeducators

Books on tape

As determined by the IEP team

Behavior Support Plans

As determined by the IEP team

Adapted Curriculum

As determined by the IEP team

LRE Data Analysis

Personnel Development Activities:

Topic

Co-Teaching, Differentiated Instruction, LRE, Flexible Grouping

 

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

2007-2008, 2008-2009 school year

IU Staff, Dr. Richard Villa

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Conferences, Study Groups, Distance Learning

Our data has already improved in the area of LRE. The state's average is 13% for the 60% or high category for Specific Learning Disability. Our average was reported at 18%. Currently, we have decreased that number to 5% for the 2007-2008 school year. Our goal is to reduce the 61% or greater percentages to the state index or below.

 

 

 

 

 

Least Restrictive Environment - Facilities

Facility Name

Type of Facility

Type of Service

# of Students Placed

Manito

Other

Alternative Education Program

10

Huntingdon Area School District

Neighboring School Districts

Elementary Life Skills Support

1

Bethesda Day Treatment Facility

Other

Partial Program

1

Extended Family Academy

Other

Partial Program

1

Meadows Partial

Other

Partial Program

2

JC Blair Partial

Other

Partial Program

3

Personnel Development for Improved Student Results

Technical Assistance and Training

Personnel Development Activities:

Topic

AYP

 

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

 

 

 

 

 

 

Topic

Participation

 

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

 

 

 

 

 

 

Topic

Proficiency-Reading First, Aimsweb, Inclusion, Co-Teaching, Differentiated Instruction, Flexible Grouping, LRE, Academy Reading, Academy of Math

 

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

Beginning during the 2007-2008 school year and continuing through the 2010 school year. August 27-28-, November 2008, January 2009.

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, Dr. Richard Villa

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Workshops with Joint Planning Periods, Conferences, Study Groups, Distance Learning

PSSA score increase
2008-2009 Reading 10% increase to 25.8%
2009-2010 Reading 10% increase to 35.8%
2010-2011 Reading 10% increase to 45.8%

2008-2009 Math 10% increase to 25%
2009-2010 Math 10% increase to 35%
2010-2011 Math 10% increase to 45%

Personnel Development - PA NCLB Goal #1

Baseline Data:

Personnel Development Activities:

Topic

Reading

 

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

June 2008, June 2009, June 2010

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, Study Island Personnel

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice

In addition to the other strategies that we incorporate in reading, Study Island provides students with reinforcement and remediation in reading. We expect to continue to see student growth in both formative and summative assessments. Our goal is to increase student performance in reading on the PSSA by 10% each school year.
PSSA Proficiency Rate score increase
2008-2009 Reading 10% increase to 25.8%
2009-2010 Reading 10% increase to 35.8%
2010-2011 Reading 10% increase to 45.8%

One day in Sept 2008, 2009, 2010 and One day in Jan 2009, 2010, 2011

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, District Staff

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

Data Analysis

An increase in student scores on the following measures: DIBELS, Scholastic Reading Inventory, Terra Nova and 4Sight Benchmark Assessment. Exploration of the following data sources that will allow staff to track student progress: Emetrics, PSSA, 4Sight Member Center, CUrriculum Matrix. Our goal is to increase student performance by 10% each school year in the above assessment.
PSSA Proficiency Rate score increase
2008-2009 Reading 10% increase to 25.8%
2009-2010 Reading 10% increase to 35.8%
2010-2011 Reading 10% increase to 45.8%

Early September 2008, 2009, 2010-2 days

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, Lexia Staff

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice

Teachers will explore differentiated instruction strategies that are available through Lexia. More differentiated instructional strategies will be incorporated in daily instruction in order to meet the individual needs of our students. Our goal is to increase student performance by 10% each school year based on Lexia scores as well as a positive impact on PSSA reading scores.
PSSA score Proficiency Rate increase
2008-2009 Reading 10% increase to 25.8%
2009-2010 Reading 10% increase to 35.8%
2010-2011 Reading 10% increase to 45.8%

Two days during the 2008-2009, 2009-2010, 2010-2011 school year

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, Read 180 staff

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice

An increase of student scores based on the implementation of the remediation software. The expected increase would be 10% each year on PSSA reading.
PSSA score Proficiency Rate increase
2008-2009 Reading 10% increase to 25.8%
2009-2010 Reading 10% increase to 35.8%
2010-2011 Reading 10% increase to 45.8%

Beginning at the end of the 2008 school year

Academy of Reading Staff

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice

Our students with special needs will increase PSSA scores in Reading by 10% each year.
PSSA score Proficiency Rate increase
2008-2009 Reading 10% increase to 25.8%
2009-2010 Reading 10% increase to 35.8%
2010-2011 Reading 10% increase to 45.8%

 

Topic

Math

 

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

June 2008, June 2009, June 2010

Study Island staff

New Staff, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

 

In addition to the other strategies that we incorporate in math, Study Island provides students with reinforcement and remediation in math. We expect to continue to see student growth in both formative and summative assessments. By incorporating Study Island for our students, we expect to see and increase of 10% in our PSSA math Proficiency rate scores.
2008-2009 Math 10% increase to 25%
2009-2010 Math 10% increase to 35%
2010-2011 Math 10% increase to 45%

One day in September 2008, 2009, 2010 and one day in Jan 2009, 2010,2011

District Staff

New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

Data groups

An increase in student scores on the following measures: DIBELS, Scholastic Reading Inventory, Terra Nova and 4Sight Benchmark Assessment. Exploration of the following data sources that will allow staff to track student progress: Emetrics, PSSA, 4Sight Member Center, Curriculum Matrix. By implementing and facilitating data groups, we expect to see and increase of 10% inthe test scores of our student on the above assessments especially on the PSSA.
PSSA Math Proficiency Rate Scores:
2008-2009 Math 10% increase to 25%
2009-2010 Math 10% increase to 35%
2010-2011 Math 10% increase to 45%

Early September 08, 09, 10-2 days

Lexia Staff

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice

Teachers will explore differentiated instruction strategies that are available through Lexia. More differentiated instructional strategies will be incorporated in daily instruction in order to meet the individual needs of our students. By incorporating Lexia we expect to see and increase of 10% in our PSSA math Proficiency Rate scores.
2008-2009 Math 10% increase to 25%
2009-2010 Math 10% increase to 35%
2010-2011 Math 10% increase to 45%

End of the 2007-2008 school year

Academy of Math

New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice

By incorporating the Academy of Math for our students with special needs, we will see an increase of 10% in our PSSA math Proficiency Rate scores.
2008-2009 Math 10% increase to 25%
2009-2010 Math 10% increase to 35%
2010-2011 Math 10% increase to 45%

Summer 2008

First in Math

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice

There will be an increase of 10% on PSSA math proficiency rate scores for students in grades 2-6.
2008-2009 Math 10% increase to 25%
2009-2010 Math 10% increase to 35%
2010-2011 Math 10% increase to 45%

Personnel Development - PA NCLB Goal #3

Baseline Data:
All of our teachers are highly qualified except our speech and language therapist who is working under an emergency certificate and is actively pursuing her master's degree and certificate.  The district communicates with paraeduators the recent changes regarding the paraeducator competencies and highly qualified requirements.  The district distributes either by hard copy or email training opportunities for paraeducators offered throughout the year.

Personnel Development Activities:

Topic

AUTISM: Students with disabilities will be provided services by an adequate supply of personnel with the knowledge and skills necessary to meet their needs

 

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

Verbal Behavior Initiative - 4 sessions as determined by PaTTAN during the 2008-2009, 2009-2010, 2010-2011 school year.

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Conferences

In taking the PASA, the students will score advanced and proficient in the areas.
2008-2009-45% score advanced or proficient
2009-2010--55% score advanced or proficient
2010-2011--70% score advanced or proficient

Summer of each year-August 2008, 2009, 2010

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, Guest speakers

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

Conferences

Staff and parents are encouraged to attend the Autism and Low Incidence Institutes held each summer. Results would be indicated by an increase of participants at the institute and strategies gained from the institute would be utilized in working with children with autism.
In taking the PASA, the students will score advanced and proficient in the areas.
2008-2009-45% score advanced or proficient
2009-2010--55% score advanced or proficient
2010-2011--70% score advanced or proficient

 

Topic

ROLE OF PARAEDUCATOR/HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHER: Students with disabilities will be provided services by an adequate supply of personnel with the knowledge and skills necessary to meet their needs

 

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

Summer 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff

Paraprofessional

Conferences

Our paraeducators will continue to seek their high qualified status by attending course offerings by PaTTAN and the IU. Paraeducators will continually update their portfolios containing their competencies checklists. All of our paraeducators will be highly qualified by 2011.

Personnel Development - PA NCLB Goal #5

Personnel Development Activities:

Topic

TRANSITION: Students with disabilities will demonstrate increased ability to successfully make the transitions to school age programs, to work, to post-secondary education and/or adult

 

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

Participation in transition team meetings sponsored by Head Start, IU 11, OVR and Career Link. September 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011. IU Transition Council September 2008,2009, 2010, 2011, November 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, January 2009, 2010, 2011, March 2009, 2010, 2011, May 2009, 2010, 2011

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, OVR/CareerLink

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Conferences, IU Transition Council

Students with disabilities are leaving high school with a plan in place looking at independent living, employment and or high education. Due to staff training and the help of our Ameri Corp staff we have been able to develop these plans. Many of our students are involved with cooperative work experiences. This number increase each year. Parents are more involved with the transition component. More site visits are being held to prospective employers as well as institutions of higher education. Recently, a career fair was held to address transition options. A partnership between the district and such career related agencies such as OVR and Career Link has been valuable in providing services to our students. The number of students and families taking advantage of these service has increased and will continue to increase.
This initiative will impact our graduation rate and drop out rate.
2008-2009 Graduation Rate at or above state percentage
2009-2010 Graduation Rate at or above state percentage
2010-2011 Graduation Rate at or above state percentage

2008-2009 Drop out rate at or below state percentage
2009-2010 Drop out rate at or below state percentage
2010-2011 Drop out rate at or below state percentage

Behavior Support Services

Summarized School District Policy:

113.1.  BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT OF STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 

Behavior management programs include a variety of techniques to develop and maintain skills that will enhance an individual student’s or young child’s opportunity for learning and self-fulfillment. Potential causes of behavior problems, such as physical or medical conditions, environmental factors, staffing and program concerns, shall be reviewed and addressed prior to development of a behavior management program.

For each eligible student or young child who exhibits behavior problems which interfere with the student’s ability to learn, including students identified as seriously emotionally disturbed, the IEP shall include provisions for a program of behavior management in accordance with Chapter 342 (relating to special education services and programs).

Positive rather than negative measures shall form the basis of behavior management programs. The types of intervention chosen for a particular student or young child shall be the least intrusive necessary and shall be in accordance with Chapter 342. Aversive techniques, restraints or discipline procedures may not be used as a substitute for a behavior management program. 

The following words and terms, when used in this policy, have the following meaning, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

Aversive techniques – deliberate activities designed to establish a negative association with a specific behavior. 

Behavior management – the development, change and maintenance of selected behaviors through the systematic application of behavior change techniques.

Positive techniques – methods which utilize positive reinforcement to shape a student’s behavior, ranging from the use of positive verbal statements as a reward for good behavior to specific tangible rewards.

Restraints – devices and techniques designed and used to control acute or episodic aggressive behaviors or to control involuntary movements or lack of muscular control due to organic causes or conditions. The term includes physical and mechanical restraints.

Positive techniques for the development, change and maintenance of selected behaviors shall be attempted prior to the use of more intrusive or restraining measures.

Restraints to control acute or episodic aggressive behavior may be used only when the student is acting in a manner as to be a clear and present danger to him/herself, to other students or to employees, and only when less restrictive measures and techniques have proven to be or are less effective. The use of restraints to control the aggressive behavior of an individual student shall cause a meeting of the IEP team to review the current IEP for appropriateness and effectiveness. The use of restraints may not be included in the IEP, employed as punishment, for the convenience of staff or as a substitute for an educational program.

Mechanical restraints, which are used to control involuntary movement or lack of muscular control of students when due to organic causes or conditions, may be employed only when specified by an IEP and as determined by a medical professional qualified to make the determination, and as agreed to by the student’s parents. Mechanical restraints shall prevent a student from injuring him/herself or others or promote normative body positioning and physical functioning.

The following aversive techniques of handling behavior are considered inappropriate and may not be used by agencies in educational programs:

1.      Corporal punishment.

2.      Punishment for a manifestation of a student’s disability.

3.      Locked rooms, locked boxes, other locked structures or spaces from which the student cannot readily exit.

4.      Noxious substances.

5.      Deprivation of basic human rights, such as withholding meals, water, or fresh air.

6.      Serial suspensions.

7.      Treatment of a demeaning nature.

8.      Electric shock. 

9.      Methods implemented by untrained personnel. 

10.  Methods which have not been outlined in the district’s plan.

The district has the primary responsibility for ensuring that behavior management programs are in accordance with this chapter and Chapter 14 (relating to special education services and programs), including the training of personnel for the use of specific procedure, methods and techniques, and for having a written policy on the use of behavior management techniques and obtaining parent consent prior to the use of highly restraining or intrusive procedures.

 

In accordance with their plans, the district may convene human right committees to oversee the use of restraining or intrusive procedures and restraints.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 



 

 

 


 

 

 

Personnel Development Activities:

Topic

Positive Behavioral Supports

 

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

The beginning of each school year

District Staff

New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice

Decease of disciplinary referrals by 10% each school year.

 

Topic

School-based Behavioral Health

 

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

Beginning of each school year.

PATTAN Staff, IU Staff, BER, SDE and other providers

Parent, New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

Conferences

Staff will be more versed in discussing behavior health concerns of students and will be able to incorporate strategies that will address behavioral health concerns. The hope would be more on site services and a decrease in out of district placements in theraputic setting and alternative settings. A 5% decrease in each of these area each school year is desirable.

 

Topic

De-escalation Techniques-CPI

 

Anticipated Training Dates

Training Partners

Training Participants and Audience

Training Format

Evidence of Results

July 17-18, 2008 and every school year.

IU Staff

New Staff, Paraprofessional, Instructional Staff, Administrative Staff, Related Service Personnel

On-site Training with Guided Practice, Workshops with Joint Planning Periods

Each school year staff will become recertified in CPI as well as new staff will participate in the intitial training. A desired goal would be to have a decrease in situations that would require de-escalation thoughout each school year.

Interagency Collaboration (11 P.S. §875.304)

Ensuring FAPE/Hard to Place Students

Incorporating the help of our various local agencies such as Youth Advocacy Program, Meadows, Raystown Developmental Services, Northwestern Human Services, Manito, Extended Family Academy, Children and Youth, and the CASSP process has aided us in securing placements for our hard to place students.  The district has been faced with finding appropriate placements for therapeutic  foster children placed in our district.  The children move into our area with high needs, especially in the area of behavior and emotional needs.  These students also come to us with incomplete information.  Our guidance office strives to secure the needed information to develop a program for the children.We are in the process of working with the sponsors of our alternative education program in examining the needs of establishing a program for elementary aged students with emotional/behavioral needs. We also have a reciprocal agreement with neighboring districts that enable us to have more options for placements.

As mentioned above the placement of therapeutic foster care students in the district has been a revolving door.  We have been very creative in designing programs for the students based on the information received from the sending district.  However very often we design a program and then the families are not equipped to deal with the emotional and behavioral needs of the child and send them on to another family outside of our district.  We strive to communicate with the agencies and the receiving district to attempt to make the transition easier for the child.

Local Continuum of Supports and Services

The district utilizes information from CASSP, SAP, MH/MR, OVR, Children and Youth, Probation, Transition staff, Early Intervention providers, Foster Care, Therapeutic Support staff providers the BSU as well as the local agencies providing service to our children.  The district is part of the IU Transition Council.  The district attends regularly scheduled Special Education Advisory Council meetings facilitated by IU 11 for updates on program and services offered throughout the IU area and the state.  We have a reciprocal agreement with neighboring districts in which we share programs.  The IU is often called upon for support, training and guidance in developing appropriate programs to meet the needs of our students. 

Our salary and bargaining unit contract is commensurate with others in the area.  We encourage our staff to attend professional development opportunities offered through the district, IU and state.

Expansion of Continuum of Supports and Services

The Mount Union Area School District ensures that we will coordinate services for eligible students with agencies that are involved with the child and family.  The district is committed to locating programs that meet the needs of each individual child.  This has resulted in locating programs outside the district and County and even outside the state to ensure the provisions of  FAPE.  The district is an actively engaged participant in all interagency team meetings.  This participation is either in person or by phone.  The district works closely with not only agencies that are providing services to the child and their families but local physicians as well.  The district has a amicable working relationship with the agencies involved.  District staff are involved with IU Transition Council, IU Special Education Advisory Council, IU Curriculum Advisory Council and IU Superintendent Advisory Council.  We collaborate with such agencies as MH/MR, BSU, CASSP, HCCTC, Northwestern Human Services, Meadows, IFC, Manito, CYS, Probation, etc. 

Program Profile

ID

OPR

Location / Building Name

Bldg Grade

Bldg Type

Type of Support

Type of Service

Low Age

High Age

Case load

Tchr FTE

-

SD

Mount Union-Kistler Elementary

E

GE

I

LS

7

10

17

1.0

-

SD

Mount Union-Kistler Elementary

E

GE

I

LS

10

12

12

1.0

-

SD

Mount Union-Kistler Elementary

E

GE

I

LS

12

13

12

1.0

-

SD

Mount Union-Kistler Elementary

E

GE

PT

AS

7

9

7

1.0

-

SD

Shirley Township Elementary

E

GE

I

LS

7

9

9

1.0

-

SD

Shirley Township Elementary

E

GE

I

LS

9

11

9

1.0

-

SD

Shirley Township Elementary

E

GE

I

LS

11

13

7

1.0

-

SD

Mapleton-Union Elementary

E

GE

I

LS

9

12

8

1.0

-

SD

Mapleton-Union Elementary

E

GE

I

LS

8

10

6

1.0

-

SD

Mount Union Area High School

M

GE

I

LS

12

14

21

1.0

-

SD

Mount Union Area High School

M

GE

I

LS

13

15

21

1.0

-

SD

Mount Union Area High School

M

GE

R

LS

12

18

0

1.0

-

SD

Mount Union Area High School

S

GE

I

LS

14

16

25

1.0

-

SD

Mount Union Area High School

S

GE

I

LS

16

18

17

1.0

-

SD

Mount Union Area High School

S

GE

I

LS

17

18

18

1.0

-

SD

Mount Union Area High School

S

GE

PT

LSS

15

19

11

1.0

-

SD

Mount Union Area High School

S

GE

PT

MDS

16

20

5

1.0

-

SD

Mount Union Area High School

S

GE

I

ES

14

18

28

1.0

-

SD

Mount Union Area High School

S

GE

R

LS

12

19

14

.5

-

SD

All Elementary School

E

GE

I

ES

9

11

3

.5

-

SD

Mount Union Kistler Elem and Shirley Twp Elem

E

GE

I

SLS

6

11

59

1.0

-

SD

Mount Union Area High School

M

GE

I

LS

13

18

20

0.5

-

IU

Mount Union Area High School

S

GE

I

SLS

14

20

24

.5

-

IU

Mapleton Union Elementary

E

GE

I

SLS

6

12

18

.4

-

IU

All School

E

GE

I

BVIS

7

20

3

.03

-

IU

All Schools

E

GE

I

DHIS

8

17

3

.13

-

SD

Mount Union Area High School

S

GE

I

LS

15

17

20

1.0


Justification: The caseload that once stated 45 is now listed as 0. This teacher is not responsible for the management of IEPs of the students. These students are on the caseloads of other teachers and this person provides direct instruction in reading and math to small groups. If we only included teachers with an assigned caseload, this person would not appear on the list even though they are providing services to students with special needs. The age range is also a concern but again these students are divided among other teachers. There is never a period where the age range is exceeded. The teacher of the age range of 12-19 also never exceeds the age range in any given class period. The age range of our SLS teacher at the elementary level has also been flagged. These students are never grouped together. This is the justification for the other areas that appear in violation of the age range.

Support Staff (District)

School District: Mount Union Area SD

ID

OPR

Title

Location

FTE

-

SD

School Psychologist

All schools

1.00

-

SD

Director of Special Education

All schools

1.00

-

SD

Paraeducators

Mapleton Union Elem

2.00

-

SD

Paraeducators

Mount Union Kistler Elem

6.50

-

SD

Paraeducators

Shirley Township Elem.

3.50

-

SD

Paraeducators

Mount Union Area High School

11.00

Contracted Support Services

ID

IU / Agency

Title / Service

Amount of Time per Week

-

TIU 11

Physical Support

195 Minutes

-

Huntingdon County Pride

Occupational Therapy

570 Minutes


ASSURANCE FOR THE OPERATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES AND PROGRAMS

School Years: 2008 - 2011

The Mount Union Area SD within Tuscarora IU 11 assures that the school district will comply with the requirements of 22 PA Code Chapter 14 and with the policies and procedures of PDE. PDE will specify, in writing, policies and procedures to be followed. Requests for any deviations from these regulations, standards, policies, and procedures must be made in writing to PDE. The school district understands that special education reports will be approved by PDE in accordance with the following criteria as set forth in 22 Pa. School Code §14.104:

  1. There are a full range of services, programs and alternative placements available to the school district for placement and implementation of the special education programs in the school district.
  2. The school district has adopted a child find system to locate, identify and evaluate young children and children who are thought to be a child with a disability eligible for special education residing within the school district's jurisdiction. Child find data is collected, maintained, and used in decision-making. Child find process and procedures are evaluated for its effectiveness. The school district implements mechanisms to disseminate child find information to the public, organizations, agencies, and individuals on at least an annual basis.
  3. The school district has adopted policies and procedures that assure that students with disabilities are included in general education programs and extracurricular and non-academic programs and activities to the maximum extent appropriate in accordance with an Individualized Education Program.
  4. The school district will comply with the PA Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education's report revision notice process.
  5. The school district follows the state and federal guidelines for participation of students with disabilities in state and district-wide assessments including the determination of participation, the need for accommodations, and the methods of assessing students for whom regular assessment is not appropriate.
  6. The school district assures the Pennsylvania Department of Education that funds received through participation in the medical assistance reimbursement program, ACCESS, will be used to enhance or expand the current level of services and programs provided to students with disabilities in this local education agency.

This assurance must be signed by the School Board President and the Superintendent for the school district to operate services and programs.


_________________________ __________     _________________________ __________
Board President                       Date                 Superintendent                         Date